← Back to Dashboard
💡 Why This Matters
The difference between a high-fee vendor and a low-cost vendor can cost you $100,000 or more over your career. That's not an exaggeration — it's math.
A teacher investing $400/month for 30 years at 7% growth (hypothetical illustration; actual results will vary):
Low-Cost Vendor (0.03%)
$472,000
High-Fee Vendor (1.5%)
$362,000
That's $110,000 gone — not to your retirement, but to your vendor's pocket. And your district is the gatekeeper. They decide which vendors are on the approved list. If Fidelity or Vanguard aren't on it, many educators ask why.
📋 Before You Send the Letter
1
Check your district's current vendor list. Ask HR or your benefits office for the list of approved 403(b) vendors. Some districts post it online.
2
Look up each vendor on 403bwise.org. Check the ratings — green light means good, yellow means caution, red means avoid.
Module 4 walks you through this.
3
Check if Fidelity or Vanguard are already available. If they are — great, you may just need to switch your account. If they're not, that's what this letter is for.
4
Get colleagues on board. One letter is good. Five letters from five different teachers? That gets attention. Share this page with your department.
📄 Letter 1: Formal Request to Add a Low-Cost Vendor
Professional, data-driven, hard to ignore. Best for an initial request to HR or Benefits.
⚠️ Fill in all highlighted fields before sending — do not copy and send as-is.
Subject: Request to Add a Low-Cost 403(b) Vendor
Dear [HR Director / Benefits Coordinator Name],
I'm writing to respectfully request that our district consider adding a low-cost 403(b) vendor to our approved provider list — specifically, [Fidelity Investments / Vanguard / both].
As I've been reviewing my retirement planning options, I've become aware of significant differences in fees between our current approved vendors and industry-leading low-cost providers. The nonprofit organization 403bwise.org, which independently rates 403(b) vendors nationwide, consistently gives [Fidelity / Vanguard] their highest rating ("green light") for low fees, transparent pricing, and employee-friendly investment options.
To put the fee difference in perspective: a teacher contributing $400 per month over a 30-year career could accumulate over $100,000 more in retirement savings simply by using a vendor with lower expense ratios. This is not a difference in investment skill — it's a difference in how much of the teacher's money goes to fees versus their own retirement.
Adding a low-cost vendor would:
• Give teachers access to index funds with expense ratios as low as 0.015–0.05% (compared to 1.0–1.5% or higher with some current vendors)
• Eliminate surrender charges and sales loads that penalize teachers for moving their own money
• Provide a fiduciary-level standard of care that prioritizes teacher outcomes
• Align our district with a growing national movement toward fee transparency in educator retirement plans
I understand that adding a new vendor involves administrative steps, and I'm happy to support that process in any way I can. I'm also aware that other teachers in our district share this interest and would welcome the opportunity.
I'd appreciate the chance to discuss this further. Thank you for your time and for everything you do to support our staff.
Respectfully,
[Your Name]
[Your School / Department]
[Your Email]
📄 Letter 2: Group Request (Multiple Teachers)
Even more powerful when signed by several teachers. Strength in numbers.
⚠️ Fill in all highlighted fields before sending — do not copy and send as-is.
Subject: Request from Staff to Add Low-Cost 403(b) Options
Dear [HR Director / Benefits Coordinator Name],
We are a group of [number] teachers at [school name / district name] writing to request that the district add a low-cost 403(b) vendor — specifically [Fidelity Investments / Vanguard / both] — to our approved provider list.
Many of us have recently reviewed our retirement account fees and discovered that the difference between our current vendors and low-cost alternatives could cost each of us tens of thousands of dollars over our careers. According to 403bwise.org, a nonprofit that independently rates 403(b) vendors, several of our district's approved vendors carry fee structures that significantly reduce long-term retirement savings for teachers.
We believe our district should provide access to at least one vendor rated "green light" by 403bwise.org. Providers like Fidelity and Vanguard offer:
• Index funds with expense ratios under 0.05%
• No surrender charges or sales loads
• Simple, transparent fee structures
• Online account management with no hidden costs
We are not asking the district to remove any existing vendors. We're simply asking that a low-cost option be made available alongside them so that teachers can make an informed choice.
We would welcome the opportunity to discuss this at an upcoming staff meeting or with the appropriate benefits committee. Thank you for considering our request.
Respectfully,
[Name, School]
[Name, School]
[Name, School]
[Name, School]
[Name, School]
📄 Letter 3: Request Through Your Union
If your district isn't responsive, the union can amplify the request during negotiations.
⚠️ Fill in all highlighted fields before sending — do not copy and send as-is.
Subject: Proposal for Bargaining — Low-Cost 403(b) Vendor Access
Dear [Union President / Rep Name],
I'd like to propose that our union include the addition of a low-cost 403(b) vendor in upcoming bargaining or member advocacy efforts.
Currently, our district's approved 403(b) vendor list does not include any providers rated "green light" by 403bwise.org, the leading independent rating organization for educator retirement plans. As a result, teachers in our district are limited to vendors with higher-than-necessary fees — costing each teacher potentially $100,000+ in lost retirement savings over a career.
Adding a low-cost provider like Fidelity or Vanguard would be a significant, concrete benefit for every member of our bargaining unit — and it costs the district nothing. These vendors do not charge the district for participation. The only requirement is administrative approval to add them to the approved list.
This is one of the highest-impact, lowest-cost improvements our union could advocate for. I'm happy to provide additional research and data to support this effort.
I'd appreciate the opportunity to discuss this at an upcoming union meeting or with the bargaining team.
Thank you,
[Your Name]
[Your School / Department]
[Your Email]
🎯 Tips for Success
Personalize the yellow highlighted sections. Fill in your district name, HR contact, school, and the specific vendor you're requesting. A personalized letter is 10x more effective than a generic one.
Reference 403bwise.org directly. It carries weight. HR may not know the site exists, and seeing an independent nonprofit rating system adds credibility to your request.
Be respectful and solution-oriented. You're not attacking anyone — you're requesting a better option alongside what already exists. Frame it as an addition, not a replacement.
Follow up. If you don't hear back in 2-3 weeks, send a polite follow-up. Persistence matters.
CC your principal or department head. This shows it's not just a random request — it's something your school leadership is aware of.
Important: In many cases, adding a vendor to a district's approved list involves little to no cost for the district — primarily administrative paperwork and approval. Fidelity and Vanguard typically do not charge school districts for being on the 403(b) vendor list, though districts may have their own review processes. If your district says "no," ask specifically what the obstacle is — and consider going through the union.